iopedu.blogg.se - Tetris friends rewritten

With a plural possessor that doesn't end -s, add 's.

I specifically did not read other First Ladies' books, because I didn't want to be influenced by how they defined the role.

(This is the wings belonging to some fairies, i.e., more than one.)

The fairies' wings glistened in the moonlight.

(This is privileges belonging to all players, i.e., more than one.)

The players' privileges have been removed.

(This is hay belonging to several horses.) With a plural possessor (provided it ends -s), add '.

A guest should be blind in another man's house.

A foolish woman knows a foolish man's faults.

Wagner's music is better than it sounds.

(This is a label belonging to Peter, i.e., one person.)

I had to remove Peter's label and replace it.

(This is the hand belonging to one girl.)

Take the girl's hand and place it on the cushion.

With one possessor (provided it doesn't end -s), add 's. More Examples of Apostrophe Placement for Possessive Nouns Singular Possessor Not Ending "-S" A possessive apostrophe never appears inside the possessor of a possessive noun.ever. Remember that everything before the apostrophe is the possessor. (The possessor is "Moses." As it already ends -s, add just '.) (The possessor is "men." As it doesn't end -s, add 's.) (The possessor is "dogs." As it already ends -s, add just '.) (The possessor is "dog." As it doesn't end -s, add 's.)

If the possessor doesn't end -s, add 's.

Here's some more guidance on placing possessive apostrophes and a top tip for checking you've done it correctly: If it does, they don't need one (add just '). If it doesn't, they need one (i.e., add 's). Writers should ask themselves whether the word already ends -s. When thinking about the placement of possessive apostrophes, writers often ask whether the apostrophe goes before the s or after the s. This infographic summarizes apostrophe placement with possessive nouns: The apostrophe in a possessive noun is called a "possessive apostrophe."Īpostrophe Placement - A Simple Rule for Everything As they now have possessive endings, horse's and horses' have become possessive nouns. In these two examples, the words "horse" and "horses" are the possessors. (The noun is "horse." It doesn't end -s, so make it possessive by adding 's.)

If the noun doesn't end -s (e.g., dog, Simon), add 's.

In other words, do not use an s if the word already ends s.) (The noun is "horses." It ends -s, so make it possessive by adding just '.

the hay of the horses = the horses' hay.

If the noun ends -s (e.g., dogs, Jesus), add just ' (an apostrophe).

Here are the rules for placing a possessive apostrophe: (When the noun already ends -s (like "fairie s"), only an apostrophe is added.) More specifically, a possessive apostrophe and the letter s are added to a noun to make the noun possessive. tl dr: read it morons.A possessive apostrophe is an apostrophe used in a noun to show that the noun owns something (e.g., woman's hat). So if you think people should learn the right way to spin or get punished, then there should be a rule specifically addressing that point, rather than it being a side-effect of a rule implemented to stop people from stalling.

Your argument is akin to saying "but that's fine because manslaughterers oughtn't be so clumsy!" But that's not what the law is there to do, so the law should be rewritten, and if people want a big punishment for manslaughterers, they can lobby for another law to be made to specifically address that. It would punish manslaughterers as well as murderers. Your logic is like, if I made a law saying "Any private citizen who kills someone is liable to a punishment of up to 25 years in prison".

Therefore that rule is unhelpful because it accomplishes more than it should do. It punishes those with a limited knowledge of spins as a side-effect. Barney: it's beside the point because: Rule (a), "If the same wallkick is performed from the same position twice by the same piece, prevent wallkicks.", was implemented in order to stop people stalling, not to punish those with a limited knowledge of spins, or to have any other function.